Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.
FDA import alert and refusal historySan Nicolas De Los Garza, MexicoFEI 1000272465
As of October 26, 2026, Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. (San Nicolas De Los Garza, Mexico) is on the red list of FDA Import Alert 45-02 (Foods with illegal or undeclared colors) for fruit filled cookie,biscuit,wafer dough, published by FDA on September 18, 2009, and has 4 FDA import refusals recorded since October 2016.
Data from FDA public records, last checked . Request a correction
Current status
- Import alerts
- IA 45-02 · red list
- Last import refusal
- Plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c. · NO ENGLISH
- Last warning letter
- None found
- Last inspection
- None on record
Every FDA record for Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.
5 records, newest first. Each line links to the FDA page it came from.
2026
- Import refusalRefused, Plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c.NO ENGLISHEntry BJG-0208658-4Source
2024
- Import refusalRefused, Salted crackersLIST INGRELABELINGNUTRIT LBLEntry BJG-0176167-4Source
2017
- Import refusalRefused, Plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c.UNSAFE COLEntry BTL-0016147-0Source
- Import refusalRefused, Plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c.UNSAFE COLEntry BTL-0016398-9Source
2009
- Import alert listingListed on Import Alert 45-02red listFruit Filled Cookie,Biscuit,Wafer DoughSource
Refusal charges, in plain English
- UNSAFE COL2 refused lines
Color additive unsafe under section 721
The product appeared to be, or to contain, a color additive that is unsafe within the meaning of section 721(a) of the FD&C Act, the section that governs which color additives may be used and how.
- LABELING1 refused line
Fair Packaging and Labeling Act
The package appeared not to meet the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act because of the placement, form, or contents of a required label statement.
- LIST INGRE1 refused line
Ingredients not listed
The product is made from two or more ingredients and the label appeared not to list the common or usual name of each one (or, for a juice beverage, the percentage of juice).
- NO ENGLISH1 refused line
Required label information not in English
Information that must appear on the label appeared not to be given in English, or not to be repeated in every language used on the label.
- NUTRIT LBL1 refused line
Nutrition information missing from label
The label or labeling appeared not to carry the nutrition information that U.S. law requires for the food.
Questions about Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.
- Is Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. on an FDA import alert?
- Yes. As of October 26, 2026, Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. is on the red list of FDA Import Alert 45-02, “Foods with illegal or undeclared colors”, for fruit filled cookie,biscuit,wafer dough; FDA published the listing on September 18, 2009.
- Has FDA refused shipments from Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.?
- Yes. FDA refused 4 shipment lines from Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. between March 16, 2017 and January 20, 2026. The most recent, on January 20, 2026, was plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c., charged as NO ENGLISH (required label information not in english).
- Why did FDA refuse Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.'s shipments?
- The most frequent charges are UNSAFE COL (color additive unsafe under section 721, 2 lines) and LABELING (fair packaging and labeling act, 1 line).
- What is Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.'s FEI number?
- Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.'s FDA Establishment Identifier (FEI) is 1000272465.
- Can shipments from Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. still enter the U.S.?
- Shipments of fruit filled cookie,biscuit,wafer dough from Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V. can be detained without physical examination under Import Alert 45-02; FDA releases them only if evidence shows they do not have the listed violation. Importers must consider this listing in their FSVP evaluation (21 CFR 1.505).
Buying from Grupo Gamesa, S.A. De C.V.?
Watch it and get the FDA record the day it changes. Free for one supplier.
SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.