How many baby food shipments from Belgium did FDA refuse in 2019?

FDA refused 1 shipment line of baby food from Belgium in 2019 through September 19, 2019.

Why does FDA refuse baby food from Belgium?

FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For baby food from Belgium the most frequent are NEEDS FCE (processor not registered for canned or acidified foods, 1 line) and NO PROCESS (no scheduled process filed, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.

Which import alerts cover baby food from Belgium?

As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Belgium in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Belgium firms; see the country page.

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: baby food from Belgium

FDA category: Baby (Infant and Junior) Food Products · October 2016 to September 19, 2019

FDA refused 1 baby food shipment line from Belgium between October 2016 and September 19, 2019, 1 of them in 2019; the most refused product was chicken and chicken combination dinner, most often for NEEDS FCE (processor not registered for canned or acidified foods).

Data from FDA public records, last checked October 26, 2026.

1
baby food lines refused since October 2016: 1
refused so far in 2019: 1%
of all FDA refusals from Belgium: 0
firms with the most records, listed below

Baby food refusals from Belgium by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.

Refusal lines by year
Year	Refusal lines	vs prior year
2019	1

Chicken and chicken combination dinner refusals from Belgium

FDA refused 1 chicken and chicken combination dinner line from Belgium between October 2016 and September 19, 2019, 100% of the baby food lines.

Chicken and chicken combination dinner product descriptions refused from Belgium
FDA product description	Lines	Share of baby food
Chicken and chicken combination dinner (baby)	1	100.0%

Recent chicken and chicken combination dinner refusals

Recent Chicken and chicken combination dinner refusals from Belgium
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Sep 19, 2019	Stogel CateringAntwerp, Belgium	Chicken and chicken combination dinner (baby)	NEEDS FCE NO PROCESS	Source

Why FDA refused baby food from Belgium

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.

Most frequent refusal charges for baby food from Belgium
Charge code	Meaning	Lines	Share
NEEDS FCE	Processor not registered for canned or acidified foods	1	50%
NO PROCESS	No scheduled process filed	1	50%

Latest baby food refusals from Belgium

Latest FDA baby food refusals from Belgium
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Sep 19, 2019	Stogel CateringAntwerp, Belgium	Chicken and chicken combination dinner (baby)	NEEDS FCE NO PROCESS	Source

Questions about baby food refusals from Belgium

How many baby food shipments from Belgium did FDA refuse in 2019?: FDA refused 1 shipment line of baby food from Belgium in 2019 through September 19, 2019.
Why does FDA refuse baby food from Belgium?: FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For baby food from Belgium the most frequent are NEEDS FCE (processor not registered for canned or acidified foods, 1 line) and NO PROCESS (no scheduled process filed, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover baby food from Belgium?: As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Belgium in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Belgium firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying baby food from Belgium?

Check each Belgium supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

Check five suppliers free Watch a supplier free

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.