How many seafood shipments from British Virgin Islands did FDA refuse in 2019?

FDA refused 1 shipment line of seafood from British Virgin Islands in 2019 through May 6, 2019.

Why does FDA refuse seafood from British Virgin Islands?

FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For seafood from British Virgin Islands the most frequent are MFRHACCP (seafood HACCP requirements not met, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.

Which import alerts cover seafood from British Virgin Islands?

As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in British Virgin Islands in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list British Virgin Islands firms; see the country page.

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: seafood from British Virgin Islands

FDA category: Fishery/Seafood Products · October 2016 to May 6, 2019

FDA refused 1 seafood shipment line from British Virgin Islands between October 2016 and May 6, 2019, 1 of them in 2019; the most refused product was spiny lobster, most often for MFRHACCP (seafood HACCP requirements not met).

Data from FDA public records, last checked October 26, 2026.

1
seafood lines refused since October 2016: 1
refused so far in 2019: 100%
of all FDA refusals from British Virgin Islands: 0
firms with the most records, listed below

Seafood refusals from British Virgin Islands by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.

Refusal lines by year
Year	Refusal lines	vs prior year
2019	1

Spiny lobster refusals from British Virgin Islands

FDA refused 1 spiny lobster line from British Virgin Islands between October 2016 and May 6, 2019, 100% of the seafood lines.

Spiny lobster product descriptions refused from British Virgin Islands
FDA product description	Lines	Share of seafood
Spiny lobster, rock lobster	1	100.0%

Recent spiny lobster refusals

Recent Spiny lobster refusals from British Virgin Islands
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
May 6, 2019	Caribbean Sustainable FisheriesTortola Road Town, British Virgin Islands	Spiny lobster, rock lobster	MFRHACCP	Source

Why FDA refused seafood from British Virgin Islands

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.

Most frequent refusal charges for seafood from British Virgin Islands
Charge code	Meaning	Lines	Share
MFRHACCP	Seafood HACCP requirements not met	1	100%

Latest seafood refusals from British Virgin Islands

Latest FDA seafood refusals from British Virgin Islands
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
May 6, 2019	Caribbean Sustainable FisheriesTortola Road Town, British Virgin Islands	Spiny lobster, rock lobster	MFRHACCP	Source

Questions about seafood refusals from British Virgin Islands

How many seafood shipments from British Virgin Islands did FDA refuse in 2019?: FDA refused 1 shipment line of seafood from British Virgin Islands in 2019 through May 6, 2019.
Why does FDA refuse seafood from British Virgin Islands?: FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For seafood from British Virgin Islands the most frequent are MFRHACCP (seafood HACCP requirements not met, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover seafood from British Virgin Islands?: As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in British Virgin Islands in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list British Virgin Islands firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying seafood from British Virgin Islands?

Check each British Virgin Islands supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

Check five suppliers free Watch a supplier free

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.