SupplierRadar

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo

FDA category: Whole Grains, Milled Grain Products, and Starch · October 2016 to July 5, 2023

FDA refused 1 grains and starch shipment line from Democratic Republic of the Congo between October 2016 and July 5, 2023, 1 of them in 2023; the most refused product was peanut flour, most often for LACKS N/C (net quantity statement missing).

Data from FDA public records, last checked .

1
grains and starch lines refused since October 2016
1
refused so far in 2023
1
firms with the most records, listed below

Grains and starch refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
Bar chart: refusal lines by 2023 to 2023. The same numbers are in the table.00.250.50.7512023: 1 refusal lines1’23
Refusal lines by year
YearRefusal linesvs prior year
20231

Peanut flour refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo

FDA refused 1 peanut flour line from Democratic Republic of the Congo between October 2016 and July 5, 2023, 100% of the grains and starch lines.
Peanut flour product descriptions refused from Democratic Republic of the Congo
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of grains and starch
Peanut flour1100.0%

Recent peanut flour refusals

Recent Peanut flour refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo
DateFirmProductCharges
Mongu Bolola BusinessMasina, Democratic Republic of the CongoPeanut flourWRONG IDENLACKS N/CNUTRIT LBLSource

Why FDA refused grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
Most frequent refusal charges for grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo
Charge codeMeaningLinesShare
LACKS N/CNet quantity statement missing133%
NUTRIT LBLNutrition information missing from label133%
WRONG IDENAppears to be misbranded as defined in section 403(b) of the FD&C Act. The article appears to be offered for…133%

Democratic Republic of the Congo grains and starch firms with the most FDA records

Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.
Democratic Republic of the Congo grains and starch firms with the most FDA records
FirmCityFDA records
Mongu Bolola BusinessMasina1

Latest grains and starch refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo

Latest FDA grains and starch refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo
DateFirmProductCharges
Mongu Bolola BusinessMasina, Democratic Republic of the CongoPeanut flourWRONG IDENLACKS N/CNUTRIT LBLSource

Questions about grains and starch refusals from Democratic Republic of the Congo

How many grains and starch shipments from Democratic Republic of the Congo did FDA refuse in 2023?
FDA refused 1 shipment line of grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2023 through July 5, 2023.
Why does FDA refuse grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo?
FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo the most frequent are LACKS N/C (net quantity statement missing, 1 line), NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label, 1 line) and WRONG IDEN (WRONG IDEN, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo?
As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Democratic Republic of the Congo in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Democratic Republic of the Congo firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying grains and starch from Democratic Republic of the Congo?

Check each Democratic Republic of the Congo supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.