SupplierRadar

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: snack foods from Dominican Republic

FDA category: Snack Food Items · October 2016 to September 8, 2021

FDA refused 3 snack foods shipment lines from Dominican Republic between October 2016 and September 8, 2021, 3 of them in 2021; the most refused product was potato snacks, most often for UNSAFE COL (color additive unsafe under section 721).

Data from FDA public records, last checked .

3
snack foods lines refused since October 2016
3
refused so far in 2021
0
firms with the most records, listed below

Snack foods refusals from Dominican Republic by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
Bar chart: refusal lines by 2021 to 2021. The same numbers are in the table.01232021: 3 refusal lines3’21
Refusal lines by year
YearRefusal linesvs prior year
20213

Potato snacks refusals from Dominican Republic

FDA refused 3 potato snacks lines from Dominican Republic between October 2016 and September 8, 2021, 100% of the snack foods lines.
Potato snacks product descriptions refused from Dominican Republic
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of snack foods
Potato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) baked3100.0%

Recent potato snacks refusals

Recent Potato snacks refusals from Dominican Republic
DateFirmProductCharges
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLCOLOR LBLGSource
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLCOLOR LBLGSource
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLSource

Why FDA refused snack foods from Dominican Republic

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
Most frequent refusal charges for snack foods from Dominican Republic
Charge codeMeaningLinesShare
UNSAFE COLColor additive unsafe under section 721360%
COLOR LBLGArtificial coloring not declared240%

Latest snack foods refusals from Dominican Republic

Latest FDA snack foods refusals from Dominican Republic
DateFirmProductCharges
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLCOLOR LBLGSource
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLCOLOR LBLGSource
Frito Lay DominicanaSanto Domingo, Dominican RepublicPotato snacks (flavored or unflavored), vegetable snacks (other than pulses) bakedUNSAFE COLSource

Questions about snack foods refusals from Dominican Republic

How many snack foods shipments from Dominican Republic did FDA refuse in 2021?
FDA refused 3 shipment lines of snack foods from Dominican Republic in 2021 through September 8, 2021.
Why does FDA refuse snack foods from Dominican Republic?
FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For snack foods from Dominican Republic the most frequent are UNSAFE COL (color additive unsafe under section 721, 3 lines) and COLOR LBLG (artificial coloring not declared, 2 lines). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover snack foods from Dominican Republic?
As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Dominican Republic in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Dominican Republic firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying snack foods from Dominican Republic?

Check each Dominican Republic supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.