SupplierRadar

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: tropical and pit fruit from Libya

FDA category: Fruit and Fruit Products (pit, subtropical and tropical fruits) · October 2016 to August 22, 2024

FDA refused 9 tropical and pit fruit shipment lines from Libya between October 2016 and August 22, 2024, 9 of them in 2024; the most refused product was dates, most often for PESTICIDE (pesticide chemical residue).

Data from FDA public records, last checked .

9
tropical and pit fruit lines refused since October 2016
9
refused so far in 2024
1
firms with the most records, listed below

Tropical and pit fruit refusals from Libya by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
Bar chart: refusal lines by 2024 to 2024. The same numbers are in the table.02.557.5102024: 9 refusal lines9’24
Refusal lines by year
YearRefusal linesvs prior year
20249

Dates refusals from Libya

FDA refused 9 dates lines from Libya between October 2016 and August 22, 2024, 100% of the tropical and pit fruit lines.
Dates product descriptions refused from Libya
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of tropical and pit fruit
Dates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)9100.0%

Recent dates refusals

Recent Dates refusals from Libya
DateFirmProductCharges
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource

Why FDA refused tropical and pit fruit from Libya

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
Most frequent refusal charges for tropical and pit fruit from Libya
Charge codeMeaningLinesShare
PESTICIDEPesticide chemical residue9100%

Libya tropical and pit fruit firms with the most FDA records

Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.
Libya tropical and pit fruit firms with the most FDA records
FirmCityFDA records
AlsababelMisratah9

Latest tropical and pit fruit refusals from Libya

Latest FDA tropical and pit fruit refusals from Libya
DateFirmProductCharges
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource
AlsababelMisratah, LibyaDates (pit fruit), (pit fruit)PESTICIDESource

Questions about tropical and pit fruit refusals from Libya

How many tropical and pit fruit shipments from Libya did FDA refuse in 2024?
FDA refused 9 shipment lines of tropical and pit fruit from Libya in 2024 through August 22, 2024.
Why does FDA refuse tropical and pit fruit from Libya?
FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For tropical and pit fruit from Libya the most frequent are PESTICIDE (pesticide chemical residue, 9 lines). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover tropical and pit fruit from Libya?
As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Libya in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Libya firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying tropical and pit fruit from Libya?

Check each Libya supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.