SupplierRadar

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: beverage bases from South Korea

FDA category: Beverage Bases · October 2016 to April 16, 2026

FDA refused 6 beverage bases shipment lines from South Korea between October 2016 and April 16, 2026, 1 of them in 2026; the most refused products were beverage base not mentioned elsewhere and fruit beverage bases, most often for NO PROCESS (no scheduled process filed).

Data from FDA public records, last checked .

6
beverage bases lines refused since October 2016
1
refused so far in 2026
3
firms with the most records, listed below

Beverage bases refusals from South Korea by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
Bar chart: refusal lines by 2020 to 2026. The same numbers are in the table.012342020: 1 refusal lines’202025: 4 refusal lines4’252026 (year to date): 1 refusal lines1’26*
* 2026 is year to date, through April 16, 2026.
Refusal lines by year
YearRefusal linesvs prior year
2026 (to date)1
20254
20201

Beverage base not mentioned elsewhere refusals from South Korea

FDA refused 2 beverage base not mentioned elsewhere lines from South Korea between October 2016 and April 16, 2026, 33% of the beverage bases lines.
Beverage base not mentioned elsewhere product descriptions refused from South Korea
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of beverage bases
Beverage base not mentioned elsewhere, n.e.c.233.3%

Recent beverage base not mentioned elsewhere refusals

Recent Beverage base not mentioned elsewhere refusals from South Korea
DateFirmProductCharges
Kaffaint Co LtdIncheon, South KoreaBeverage base not mentioned elsewhere, n.e.cFALSELACKS FIRMNUTRIT LBLSource
Sejun Food Co., LtdGwangju, South KoreaBeverage base not mentioned elsewhere, n.e.cNEEDS FCENO PROCESSSource

Fruit beverage bases refusals from South Korea

FDA refused 2 fruit beverage bases lines from South Korea between October 2016 and April 16, 2026, 33% of the beverage bases lines.
Fruit beverage bases product descriptions refused from South Korea
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of beverage bases
Fruit beverage bases, liquid, n.e.c.233.3%

Recent fruit beverage bases refusals

Recent Fruit beverage bases refusals from South Korea
DateFirmProductCharges
Korean Pears Cooperative UnionJinju, South KoreaFruit beverage bases, liquid, n.e.cNO PROCESSSource
Kaffa IntSeoul, South KoreaFruit beverage bases, liquid, n.e.cCOLOR LBLGNO ENGLISHNUTRIT LBL+1Source

Beverage base refusals from South Korea

FDA refused 2 beverage base lines from South Korea between October 2016 and April 16, 2026, 33% of the beverage bases lines.
Beverage base product descriptions refused from South Korea
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of beverage bases
Beverage base, subtropical or tropical fruit116.7%
Beverage base, vine fruit, liquid116.7%

Recent beverage base refusals

Recent Beverage base refusals from South Korea
DateFirmProductCharges
Kaffa IntSeoul, South KoreaBeverage base, vine fruit, liquidCOLOR LBLGNO ENGLISHNUTRIT LBL+2Source
Pureplus Co., LtdHamyang, South KoreaBeverage base, subtropical or tropical fruitUNSAFE COLSource

Why FDA refused beverage bases from South Korea

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
Most frequent refusal charges for beverage bases from South Korea
Charge codeMeaningLinesShare
NO PROCESSNo scheduled process filed425%
NUTRIT LBLNutrition information missing from label319%
COLOR LBLGArtificial coloring not declared213%
NO ENGLISHRequired label information not in English213%
FALSEFalse or misleading labeling16%
LACKS FIRMManufacturer name and address missing16%
NEEDS FCEProcessor not registered for canned or acidified foods16%
UNSAFE COLColor additive unsafe under section 72116%
YELLOW #5FD&C Yellow No. 5 not declared16%

South Korea beverage bases firms with the most FDA records

Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.
South Korea beverage bases firms with the most FDA records
FirmCityFDA records
Kaffa IntSeoul2
Pureplus Co., LtdHamyang1
Sejun Food Co., LtdGwangju1

Latest beverage bases refusals from South Korea

Latest FDA beverage bases refusals from South Korea
DateFirmProductCharges
Korean Pears Cooperative UnionJinju, South KoreaFruit beverage bases, liquid, n.e.cNO PROCESSSource
Kaffaint Co LtdIncheon, South KoreaBeverage base not mentioned elsewhere, n.e.cFALSELACKS FIRMNUTRIT LBLSource
Kaffa IntSeoul, South KoreaBeverage base, vine fruit, liquidCOLOR LBLGNO ENGLISHNUTRIT LBL+2Source
Kaffa IntSeoul, South KoreaFruit beverage bases, liquid, n.e.cCOLOR LBLGNO ENGLISHNUTRIT LBL+1Source
Sejun Food Co., LtdGwangju, South KoreaBeverage base not mentioned elsewhere, n.e.cNEEDS FCENO PROCESSSource
Pureplus Co., LtdHamyang, South KoreaBeverage base, subtropical or tropical fruitUNSAFE COLSource

Questions about beverage bases refusals from South Korea

How many beverage bases shipments from South Korea did FDA refuse in 2026?
FDA refused 1 shipment line of beverage bases from South Korea in 2026 through April 16, 2026, compared with 4 in 2025.
Why does FDA refuse beverage bases from South Korea?
FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For beverage bases from South Korea the most frequent are NO PROCESS (no scheduled process filed, 4 lines), NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label, 3 lines) and COLOR LBLG (artificial coloring not declared, 2 lines). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover beverage bases from South Korea?
As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in South Korea in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list South Korea firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying beverage bases from South Korea?

Check each South Korea supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.