How many meal replacements shipments from Sweden did FDA refuse in 2025?

FDA refused 1 shipment line of meal replacements from Sweden in 2025 through April 25, 2025, compared with 1 in 2024.

Why does FDA refuse meal replacements from Sweden?

FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For meal replacements from Sweden the most frequent are NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label, 2 lines), FALSE (false or misleading labeling, 1 line) and LACKS N/C (net quantity statement missing, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.

Which import alerts cover meal replacements from Sweden?

As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Sweden in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Sweden firms; see the country page.

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: meal replacements from Sweden

FDA category: Dietary Conventional Foods and Meal Replacements · October 2016 to April 25, 2025

FDA refused 3 meal replacements shipment lines from Sweden between October 2016 and April 25, 2025, 1 of them in 2025; the most refused products were dietary conventional foods and foods with supplemental nutrients added, most often for NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label).

Data from FDA public records, last checked October 26, 2026.

3
meal replacements lines refused since October 2016: 1
refused so far in 2025: 1%
of all FDA refusals from Sweden: 1
firms with the most records, listed below

Meal replacements refusals from Sweden by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.

Refusal lines by year
Year	Refusal lines	vs prior year
2025	1	0%
2024	1
2017	1

Dietary conventional foods refusals from Sweden

FDA refused 1 dietary conventional foods line from Sweden between October 2016 and April 25, 2025, 33% of the meal replacements lines.

Dietary conventional foods product descriptions refused from Sweden
FDA product description	Lines	Share of meal replacements
Dietary conventional foods, n.e.c.	1	33.3%

Recent dietary conventional foods refusals

Recent Dietary conventional foods refusals from Sweden
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Mar 18, 2024	Gutfeeling Labs ABLund, Sweden	Dietary conventional foods, n.e.c	NUTRIT LBL	Source

Foods with supplemental nutrients added refusals from Sweden

FDA refused 1 foods with supplemental nutrients added line from Sweden between October 2016 and April 25, 2025, 33% of the meal replacements lines.

Foods with supplemental nutrients added product descriptions refused from Sweden
FDA product description	Lines	Share of meal replacements
Foods with supplemental nutrients added, with or without artifical sweetners	1	33.3%

Recent foods with supplemental nutrients added refusals

Recent Foods with supplemental nutrients added refusals from Sweden
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Apr 25, 2025	Barebells Functional FoodsStockholm, Sweden	Foods with supplemental nutrients added, with or without artifical sweetners	NO ENGLISH	Source

Medical foods refusals from Sweden

FDA refused 1 medical foods line from Sweden between October 2016 and April 25, 2025, 33% of the meal replacements lines.

Medical foods product descriptions refused from Sweden
FDA product description	Lines	Share of meal replacements
Medical foods, n.e.c.	1	33.3%

Recent medical foods refusals

Recent Medical foods refusals from Sweden
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Aug 7, 2017	LantmannenMalmo, Sweden	Medical foods, n.e.c	FALSE LACKS N/C USUAL NAME+1	Source

Why FDA refused meal replacements from Sweden

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.

Most frequent refusal charges for meal replacements from Sweden
Charge code	Meaning	Lines	Share
NUTRIT LBL	Nutrition information missing from label	2	33%
FALSE	False or misleading labeling	1	17%
LACKS N/C	Net quantity statement missing	1	17%
NO ENGLISH	Required label information not in English	1	17%
USUAL NAME	Common or usual name missing	1	17%

Sweden meal replacements firms with the most FDA records

Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.

Sweden meal replacements firms with the most FDA records
Firm	City	FDA records
Lantmannen	Malmo	1

Latest meal replacements refusals from Sweden

Latest FDA meal replacements refusals from Sweden
Date	Firm	Product	Charges
Apr 25, 2025	Barebells Functional FoodsStockholm, Sweden	Foods with supplemental nutrients added, with or without artifical sweetners	NO ENGLISH	Source
Mar 18, 2024	Gutfeeling Labs ABLund, Sweden	Dietary conventional foods, n.e.c	NUTRIT LBL	Source
Aug 7, 2017	LantmannenMalmo, Sweden	Medical foods, n.e.c	FALSE LACKS N/C USUAL NAME+1	Source

Questions about meal replacements refusals from Sweden

How many meal replacements shipments from Sweden did FDA refuse in 2025?: FDA refused 1 shipment line of meal replacements from Sweden in 2025 through April 25, 2025, compared with 1 in 2024.
Why does FDA refuse meal replacements from Sweden?: FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For meal replacements from Sweden the most frequent are NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label, 2 lines), FALSE (false or misleading labeling, 1 line) and LACKS N/C (net quantity statement missing, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover meal replacements from Sweden?: As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Sweden in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Sweden firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying meal replacements from Sweden?

Check each Sweden supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

Check five suppliers free Watch a supplier free

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.