FDA import refusals
FDA import refusals: sweeteners from Vietnam
FDA category: Food Sweeteners (Nutritive) · October 2016 to June 6, 2022
FDA refused 6 sweeteners shipment lines from Vietnam between October 2016 and June 6, 2022, 4 of them in 2022; the most refused product was honey, most often for SUBSTITUTE (SUBSTITUTE).
Data from FDA public records, last checked .
- 6
- sweeteners lines refused since October 2016
- 4
- refused so far in 2022
- 3
- firms with the most records, listed below
Sweeteners refusals from Vietnam by year
Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
| Year | Refusal lines | vs prior year |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | |
| 2017 | 1 | |
| 2016 (from Oct) | 1 |
Honey refusals from Vietnam
FDA refused 6 honey lines from Vietnam between October 2016 and June 6, 2022, 100% of the sweeteners lines.
| FDA product description | Lines | Share of sweeteners |
|---|---|---|
| Honey | 6 | 100.0% |
Recent honey refusals
| Date | Firm | Product | Charges | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hai Phong HoneybeeHo Chi Minh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Thanh Hao Bees Company LimitedBu Dang District,, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Hai Phong Company Ltd.Hochiminh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Hai Phong Company Ltd.Hochiminh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Dinh Asia Company LtdHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam | Honey | UNSAFE ADD | Source |
Why FDA refused sweeteners from Vietnam
FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
| Charge code | Meaning | Lines | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUBSTITUTE | Appears that a substance has been substituted wholly or in part for one or more of the article's ingredients. | 4 | 67% |
| PESTICIDE | Pesticide chemical residue | 1 | 17% |
| UNSAFE ADD | Food additive unsafe under section 409 | 1 | 17% |
Import alerts for sweeteners that list Vietnam firms
| Alert | Covers | Red | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36-04 | Honey and blended syrup: drug residues | 5 |
Vietnam sweeteners firms with the most FDA records
Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.
| Firm | City | FDA records |
|---|---|---|
| Hai Phong Company Ltd. | Hochiminh | 2 |
| Dinh Asia Company Ltd | Ho Chi Minh City | 1 |
| Hai Phong Honeybee | Ho Chi Minh | 1 |
Latest sweeteners refusals from Vietnam
| Date | Firm | Product | Charges | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hai Phong HoneybeeHo Chi Minh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Thanh Hao Bees Company LimitedBu Dang District,, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Hai Phong Company Ltd.Hochiminh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Hai Phong Company Ltd.Hochiminh, Vietnam | Honey | SUBSTITUTE | Source | |
| Dinh Asia Company LtdHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam | Honey | UNSAFE ADD | Source | |
| Huong Rung Company LimitedXuan Loc Town, Vietnam | Honey | PESTICIDE | Source |
Questions about sweeteners refusals from Vietnam
- How many sweeteners shipments from Vietnam did FDA refuse in 2022?
- FDA refused 4 shipment lines of sweeteners from Vietnam in 2022 through June 6, 2022.
- Why does FDA refuse sweeteners from Vietnam?
- FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For sweeteners from Vietnam the most frequent are SUBSTITUTE (SUBSTITUTE, 4 lines), PESTICIDE (pesticide chemical residue, 1 line) and UNSAFE ADD (food additive unsafe under section 409, 1 line). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
- Which import alerts cover sweeteners from Vietnam?
- As of October 27, 2026, the FDA import alerts for this category that list Vietnam firms are Import Alert 36-04 (5 firms). General food alerts numbered 99-xx can list Vietnam firms too; see the country page.
Built for the person who signs the FSVP file
Buying sweeteners from Vietnam?
Check each Vietnam supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.
SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.