Botanical Products, Inc.
FDA import alert and refusal historyMississauga, CanadaFEI 3014792844
As of October 25, 2026, Botanical Products, Inc. is not on any FDA import alert in SupplierRadar's records; FDA refused 17 of its shipment lines between November 16, 2018 and March 28, 2019, most often for dietary ingredient without safety assurance (UNSFDIETSP).
Data from FDA public records, last checked . Request a correction
Current status
- Import alerts
- Not listed
- Last import refusal
- Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued) · UNSFDIETSP
- Last warning letter
- None found
- Last inspection
- None on record
Every FDA record for Botanical Products, Inc.
17 records, newest first. Each line links to the FDA page it came from.
2019
- Import refusalSource
Refused, 2 lines in one entry: Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued); Tea, n.e.c.UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGLACKS FIRMEntry SCS-3822417-7Show 2 linesHide lines
- Refused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-3822417-7Source
- Refused, Tea, n.e.c.LACKS FIRMLACKS N/CEntry SCS-3822417-7Source
- Import refusalSource
Refused, 2 lines in one entry: Tea, n.e.c.; Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)LIST INGRELACKS FIRMLACKS N/CUNSFDIETSPEntry SCS-2320738-5Show 2 linesHide lines
- Refused, Tea, n.e.c.LIST INGRELACKS FIRMLACKS N/CEntry SCS-2320738-5Source
- Refused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPDIETARYLBLNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-2320738-5Source
2018
- Import refusalRefused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-1934615-5Source
- Import refusalRefused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-2045218-2Source
- Import refusalRefused, Tea, n.e.c.LACKS N/CNUTRIT LBLEntry SCS-1934615-5Source
- Import refusalRefused, Tea, n.e.c.LIST INGRELACKS FIRMLACKS N/CEntry SCS-2045218-2Source
- Import refusalRefused, Tea, n.e.c.LIST INGRELACKS FIRMLACKS N/CEntry SCS-1934409-3Source
- Import refusalRefused, Tea, n.e.c.LIST INGRELACKS FIRMLACKS N/CEntry SCS-1933930-9Source
- Import refusalRefused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-1934409-3Source
- Import refusalRefused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPLIST INGRELACKS FIRMLABELINGEntry SCS-1933930-9Source
- Import refusalSource
Refused, 3 lines in one entry: Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued); Tea, n.e.c.UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGLACKS N/CEntry SCS-1981777-5Show 3 linesHide lines
- Refused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-1981777-5Source
- Refused, Tea, n.e.c.LACKS N/CEntry SCS-1981777-5Source
- Refused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPNCONTACTLABELINGEntry SCS-1981777-5Source
- Import refusalSource
Refused, 2 lines in one entry: Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued); Tea, n.e.c.UNSFDIETSPDIETARYLBLLACKS FIRMNCONTACTEntry SCS-1833698-3Show 2 linesHide lines
- Refused, Kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued)UNSFDIETSPEntry SCS-1833698-3Source
- Refused, Tea, n.e.c.DIETARYLBLLACKS FIRMNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLEntry SCS-1833698-3Source
Refusal charges, in plain English
- UNSFDIETSP9 refused lines
Dietary ingredient without safety assurance
The product appeared to be a dietary supplement or dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that it does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury.
- LABELING8 refused lines
Fair Packaging and Labeling Act
The package appeared not to meet the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act because of the placement, form, or contents of a required label statement.
- NCONTACT8 refused lines
No U.S. adverse event contact on supplement label
The dietary supplement label appeared not to show a U.S. address or phone number through which a serious adverse event can be reported.
- LACKS FIRM7 refused lines
Manufacturer name and address missing
The packaged product's label appeared not to show the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.
- LACKS N/C7 refused lines
Net quantity statement missing
The packaged food appeared not to carry an accurate statement of the quantity of contents, such as net weight, measure, or count, on its label.
- LIST INGRE5 refused lines
Ingredients not listed
The product is made from two or more ingredients and the label appeared not to list the common or usual name of each one (or, for a juice beverage, the percentage of juice).
- DIETARYLBL2 refused lines
Not identified as a dietary supplement
The label appeared not to identify the product with the term "dietary supplement" (which may be modified with the name of an ingredient).
- NUTRIT LBL2 refused lines
Nutrition information missing from label
The label or labeling appeared not to carry the nutrition information that U.S. law requires for the food.
Questions about Botanical Products, Inc.
- Is Botanical Products, Inc. on an FDA import alert?
- No listing for Botanical Products, Inc. appears in the FDA import alerts SupplierRadar checked on October 25, 2026. Country-wide alerts may still apply to its products; see the Canada page.
- Has FDA refused shipments from Botanical Products, Inc.?
- Yes. FDA refused 17 shipment lines from Botanical Products, Inc. between November 16, 2018 and March 28, 2019. The most recent, on March 28, 2019, was kratom (herbal and botanical teas ii, continued), charged as UNSFDIETSP (dietary ingredient without safety assurance).
- Why did FDA refuse Botanical Products, Inc.'s shipments?
- The most frequent charges are UNSFDIETSP (dietary ingredient without safety assurance, 9 lines) and LABELING (fair packaging and labeling act, 8 lines).
- What is Botanical Products, Inc.'s FEI number?
- Botanical Products, Inc.'s FDA Establishment Identifier (FEI) is 3014792844.
Buying from Botanical Products, Inc.?
Watch it and get the FDA record the day it changes. Free for one supplier.
SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.