SupplierRadar

Montreal Pita Inc

FDA import alert and refusal historySaint-Laurent, CanadaFEI 3020323157

Recorded by FDA as MONTREAL PITA INC

Watch this supplier

Watch this supplier

Get an email when FDA publishes anything new on Montreal Pita Inc.

Enter your work email and confirm with the link we send. Your first supplier is free, with no password and no card.

Example subjectMontreal Pita In added to Import Alert 16-129 (red list)

Free for one supplier. No password, no card.

As of October 26, 2026, Montreal Pita Inc is not on any FDA import alert in SupplierRadar's records; FDA refused 3 of its shipment lines between June 26, 2024 and July 7, 2025, most often for major food allergen not declared (ALLERGEN).

Data from FDA public records, last checked . Request a correction

Current status

Import alerts
Not listed
Last import refusal
Biscuit prepared dry mix without milk or egg · INCONSPICU
Last warning letter
None found
Last inspection
None on record

Every FDA record for Montreal Pita Inc

3 records, newest first. Each line links to the FDA page it came from.

2025

  1. Import refusal
    Refused, 2 lines in one entry: Biscuit prepared dry mix without milk or egg; Pita, bread/rolls/bunsINCONSPICUALLERGENLIST INGRELACKS FIRMEntry 300-1890813-8Show 2 lines
    Source

2024

  1. Import refusal
    Refused, Plain cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c.LIST INGREALLERGENEntry 186-6717711-0
    Source

Refusal charges, in plain English

  • ALLERGEN2 refused lines

    Major food allergen not declared

    The label appeared not to declare all major food allergens present in the product, as section 403(w) of the FD&C Act requires.

  • LIST INGRE2 refused lines

    Ingredients not listed

    The product is made from two or more ingredients and the label appeared not to list the common or usual name of each one (or, for a juice beverage, the percentage of juice).

  • INCONSPICU1 refused line

    Required information not conspicuous

    Information required on the label appeared not to be placed prominently or conspicuously enough to be read and understood by an ordinary consumer.

  • LACKS FIRM1 refused line

    Manufacturer name and address missing

    The packaged product's label appeared not to show the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.

  • NUTRIT LBL1 refused line

    Nutrition information missing from label

    The label or labeling appeared not to carry the nutrition information that U.S. law requires for the food.

  • USUAL NAME1 refused line

    Common or usual name missing

    The label appeared not to show the common or usual name of the food.

Questions about Montreal Pita Inc

Is Montreal Pita Inc on an FDA import alert?
No listing for Montreal Pita Inc appears in the FDA import alerts SupplierRadar checked on October 26, 2026. Country-wide alerts may still apply to its products; see the Canada page.
Has FDA refused shipments from Montreal Pita Inc?
Yes. FDA refused 3 shipment lines from Montreal Pita Inc between June 26, 2024 and July 7, 2025. The most recent, on July 7, 2025, was biscuit prepared dry mix without milk or egg, charged as INCONSPICU (required information not conspicuous).
Why did FDA refuse Montreal Pita Inc's shipments?
The most frequent charges are ALLERGEN (major food allergen not declared, 2 lines) and LIST INGRE (ingredients not listed, 2 lines).
What is Montreal Pita Inc's FEI number?
Montreal Pita Inc's FDA Establishment Identifier (FEI) is 3020323157.

Buying from Montreal Pita Inc?

Watch it and get the FDA record the day it changes. Free for one supplier.

Watch this supplier

Watch this supplier

Get an email when FDA publishes anything new on Montreal Pita Inc.

Enter your work email and confirm with the link we send. Your first supplier is free, with no password and no card.

Example subjectMontreal Pita In added to Import Alert 16-129 (red list)

Free for one supplier. No password, no card.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.