FDA refusal charge
FDA refusal charge INCONSPICU
INCONSPICU is the FDA import refusal charge for required information not conspicuous; it cites sections 403(f) and 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act (misbranding). FDA recorded it on 2,425 refused shipment lines between October 2016 and October 15, 2026, most often for snack foods from Mexico.
Data from FDA public records, last checked .
- 2,425
- refused shipment lines carry this charge
- 78
- countries of origin
- 1
- import alert names this charge
What INCONSPICU means
Information required on the label appeared not to be placed prominently or conspicuously enough to be read and understood by an ordinary consumer.
This restates FDA's statement. It says what the charge means, never why a particular shipment was refused.
- FD&C Act section
- 403(f)801(a)(3)
- Classification
- misbranding
FDA's official statement
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(f) of the FD&C Act in that any word, statement, or other information required by or under the authority of the FD&C Act to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary terms of purchase and use (for example, label contains information in two or more languages but fails to repeat all required information in both languages in accordance with 21 CFR 101.15(c)(2), or label fails to include all required information in English in accordance with 21 CFR 101.15(c)(1), except in the case of articles distributed solely in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or in a Territory where the predominant language is one other than English)).
Import alerts that name INCONSPICU
| Alert | Covers | Red | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 99-39 | Imported foods that appear to be misbranded | 677 |
Countries with the most INCONSPICU refusals
| Country | Lines | Share of INCONSPICU |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 988 | 41% |
| India | 157 | 6% |
| China | 142 | 6% |
| Canada | 106 | 4% |
| South Korea | 103 | 4% |
| Thailand | 71 | 3% |
| Turkey | 68 | 3% |
| Philippines | 64 | 3% |
| Italy | 51 | 2% |
| Japan | 43 | 2% |
Product categories with the most INCONSPICU refusals
| Category | Lines | Share of INCONSPICU |
|---|---|---|
| Snack Food Items | 335 | 14% |
| Candy without Chocolate, Candy Specialties, and Chewing Gum | 256 | 11% |
| Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties | 237 | 10% |
| Soft Drinks and Waters | 203 | 8% |
| Fruit and Fruit Products (pit, subtropical and tropical fruits) | 163 | 7% |
| Dietary Conventional Foods and Meal Replacements | 153 | 6% |
| Bakery Products, Doughs, Bakery Mixes, and Icings | 134 | 6% |
| Multiple Food Dinners, Gravies, Sauces, and Specialties | 122 | 5% |
| Macaroni and Noodle Products | 83 | 3% |
| Chocolate and Cocoa Products | 67 | 3% |
Latest INCONSPICU refusals
| Date | Firm | Product | Charges | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amafil Ind. Com. Alimentos LtdaCianorte, Brazil | Tapioca starch product | INCONSPICUNUTRIT LBL | Source | |
| Expandy Co LtdNishinomiya, Japan | Whey base infant formula product (0-12 months), powder formula | INCONSPICULACKS N/C | Source | |
| Amafil Ind. Com. Alimentos LtdaCianorte, Brazil | Tapioca starch product | INCONSPICUNUTRIT LBL | Source | |
| Productos de Lacteos GabrielOlancho, Honduras | Cream, sour | STD IDENTSTD QUALITINCONSPICU+2 | Source | |
| Ahmad M.S Dirani & Bros FactoryBaalbeck, Lebanon | Mixed vegetables, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS FIRMNEEDS FCE+1 | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Sweet goods without custard or cream filling, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS N/CUSUAL NAME+1 | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Sweet goods without custard or cream filling, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS N/CUSUAL NAME+1 | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Sweet goods without custard or cream filling, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS N/CUSUAL NAME+1 | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Sweet goods without custard or cream filling, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS N/CNUTRIT LBL | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Filled/iced cookies,biscuits and wafers, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS FIRMLACKS N/C+2 | Source | |
| StemPhase BiomedicalMono, Canada | Animal feeds, n.e.c | LIST INGREINCONSPICULACKS FIRM+2 | Source | |
| StemPhase BiomedicalMono, Canada | Animal feeds, n.e.c | LIST INGREINCONSPICULACKS FIRM+2 | Source | |
| Dreamo Gida Teks San Ve Tic LtdGaziantep, Turkey | Sweet goods without custard or cream filling, n.e.c | INCONSPICULACKS N/CUSUAL NAME+1 | Source | |
| StemPhase BiomedicalMono, Canada | Animal feeds, n.e.c | LIST INGREINCONSPICULACKS FIRM+2 | Source | |
| Goldilocks BakeshopMetro Manila, Philippines | Biscuits | LIST INGREINCONSPICUFALSE+2 | Source | |
| Nutri-Asia, IncorporatedCabuyao, Philippines | Banana sauce | UNSAFE COLINCONSPICUFALSE+2 | Source | |
| Nutri-Asia, IncorporatedCabuyao, Philippines | Banana sauce | INCONSPICUFALSENUTRIT LBL | Source | |
| Bubs GodisJonkoping, Sweden | Jellied candy, soft (jelly beans, gum drops, etc.), without nuts and fruit (without chocolate) | LIST INGREINCONSPICUCOLOR LBLG+7 | Source | |
| Bubs GodisJonkoping, Sweden | Jellied candy, soft (jelly beans, gum drops, etc.), without nuts and fruit (without chocolate) | LIST INGREINCONSPICUCOLOR LBLG+7 | Source | |
| Nutri-Asia, IncorporatedCabuyao, Philippines | Banana sauce | INCONSPICUFALSENUTRIT LBL | Source |
Questions about INCONSPICU
- What does INCONSPICU mean on an FDA refusal?
- INCONSPICU is the refusal charge “Required information not conspicuous”. Information required on the label appeared not to be placed prominently or conspicuously enough to be read and understood by an ordinary consumer.
- What law does INCONSPICU cite?
- FDA's refusal charge table cites sections 403(f) and 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act (misbranding) for INCONSPICU, and classifies the charge as misbranding. The table is the Refusal Charges reference file that FDA publishes with its Data Dashboard.
- Which countries have the most INCONSPICU refusals?
- As of October 26, 2026, the countries with the most INCONSPICU refusal lines are Mexico (988), India (157) and China (142). The full list with links is in the table on this page.
- Is there an FDA import alert for INCONSPICU?
- Yes. One FDA import alert names INCONSPICU as a charge code, including Import Alert 99-39 (Imported foods that appear to be misbranded). An import alert is a list of firms; a charge code is the reason recorded on one refused shipment line.
Built for the person who signs the FSVP file
Look before you order.
Check up to five suppliers against every FDA record in one paste, no account needed. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.
SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.