SupplierRadar

FDA import refusals

FDA import refusals: meal replacements from Thailand

FDA category: Dietary Conventional Foods and Meal Replacements · October 2016 to August 13, 2026

FDA refused 13 meal replacements shipment lines from Thailand between October 2016 and August 13, 2026, 8 of them in 2026; the most refused products were dietary conventional foods and oral rehydration products, most often for NO ENGLISH (required label information not in English).

Data from FDA public records, last checked .

13
meal replacements lines refused since October 2016
8
refused so far in 2026
1
firms with the most records, listed below

Meal replacements refusals from Thailand by year

Shipment lines FDA refused each year. The table has the same numbers as the chart.
Bar chart: refusal lines by 2017 to 2026. The same numbers are in the table.024682017: 2 refusal lines’172020: 1 refusal lines’202022: 1 refusal lines’222025: 1 refusal lines’252026 (year to date): 8 refusal lines8’26*
* 2026 is year to date, through August 13, 2026.
Refusal lines by year
YearRefusal linesvs prior year
2026 (to date)8
20251
20221
20201
20172

Dietary conventional foods refusals from Thailand

FDA refused 12 dietary conventional foods lines from Thailand between October 2016 and August 13, 2026, 92% of the meal replacements lines.
Dietary conventional foods product descriptions refused from Thailand
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of meal replacements
Dietary conventional foods, n.e.c.1292.3%

Recent dietary conventional foods refusals

Recent Dietary conventional foods refusals from Thailand
DateFirmProductCharges
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource

Oral rehydration products refusals from Thailand

FDA refused 1 oral rehydration products line from Thailand between October 2016 and August 13, 2026, 8% of the meal replacements lines.
Oral rehydration products product descriptions refused from Thailand
FDA product descriptionLinesShare of meal replacements
Oral rehydration products17.7%

Recent oral rehydration products refusals

Recent Oral rehydration products refusals from Thailand
DateFirmProductCharges
Sea Pharm Co., LTDPranakornsriayutthaya, ThailandOral rehydration productsNO ENGLISHSource

Why FDA refused meal replacements from Thailand

FDA records a charge code on each refused line; one line can carry several.
Most frequent refusal charges for meal replacements from Thailand
Charge codeMeaningLinesShare
NO ENGLISHRequired label information not in English1236%
NCONTACTNo U.S. adverse event contact on supplement label1030%
NUTRIT LBLNutrition information missing from label927%
INCONSPICURequired information not conspicuous13%
UNAPPROVEDUnapproved new drug13%

Thailand meal replacements firms with the most FDA records

Counts are FDA records in SupplierRadar's data, not a ranking of quality.
Thailand meal replacements firms with the most FDA records
FirmCityFDA records
Di-Well GroupsBangkok8

Latest meal replacements refusals from Thailand

Latest FDA meal replacements refusals from Thailand
DateFirmProductCharges
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Di-Well GroupsBangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource
Blossom JellySakhon, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cINCONSPICUNO ENGLISHSource
Napapon LatapyRayong, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cUNAPPROVEDSource
Sea Pharm Co., LTDPranakornsriayutthaya, ThailandOral rehydration productsNO ENGLISHSource
Ak 91Bangkok, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTSource
Siam Freight Co. LtdMae Sai, ThailandDietary conventional foods, n.e.cNO ENGLISHNCONTACTNUTRIT LBLSource

Questions about meal replacements refusals from Thailand

How many meal replacements shipments from Thailand did FDA refuse in 2026?
FDA refused 8 shipment lines of meal replacements from Thailand in 2026 through August 13, 2026, compared with 1 in 2025.
Why does FDA refuse meal replacements from Thailand?
FDA records a charge code on every refused shipment line. For meal replacements from Thailand the most frequent are NO ENGLISH (required label information not in English, 12 lines), NCONTACT (no U.S. adverse event contact on supplement label, 10 lines) and NUTRIT LBL (nutrition information missing from label, 9 lines). A charge describes what FDA's reference table says about one shipment line, not about every firm.
Which import alerts cover meal replacements from Thailand?
As of October 26, 2026, no import alert numbered under this category lists a firm in Thailand in SupplierRadar's records. General food alerts numbered 99-xx can still list Thailand firms; see the country page.

Built for the person who signs the FSVP file

Buying meal replacements from Thailand?

Check each Thailand supplier against every FDA record in one paste, free for five suppliers. Watch the ones you buy from and get the source the day a record changes.

SupplierRadar is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Data comes from public FDA records and may contain errors. This is not legal advice; importers remain responsible for their supplier evaluations.